Noonan’s Gag Advice To Harris

WSJ’s Peggy Noonan loses her marbles every 4 yrs. In 2020 she predicted a Trump win based on lawn signage. Now she’s advising Harris to call out No. 45 because he will “likely” end the Constitution if he loses rather than tell Harris to end unconstitutional law fare against Trump.

The temerity & ignorance of a WSJ columnist in the guise of defending the Constitution in this instance. Never mind the two drummed up Trump impeachments. How many lawsuits & prosecutions were launched by Democratic lawyers & pols against Trump & his allies since the man surrendered the White House to Biden? The list is unprecedented. And yet, Noonan suggests all that has been an example of “peaceful process” by lovers of the Constitution while ignoring it has arguably been the most blatant assault on Constitutional norms in American history. Meanwhile, she tells Harris IF she “thinks Mr. Trump is a danger to the Constitution … [and, Noonan thinks “if Trump loses he will likely reject the outcome” again] … then … it is a national emergency …”and Harris should put her “own ideological purity & pride aside.”

Gag! Not that Trump, as Noonan writes, doesn’t “hate” to lose and will be “angry” if he does. Does Noonan think Harris will pop a cork when she loses? As if Hillary Clinton did in 2016? Or, will they continue to engage in their “peaceful [aka Trumped Up law fare,” the Constitution be damned?

Davd Soul